About the Museum Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum Calendar of Events Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum Special Events Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum Press
Exhibitions Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum Collections Online Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum Education Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum Visit Cooper-Hewitt Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum Join & Support Cooper-Hewitt Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum National Design Awards Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum The Shop at Cooper-Hewitt

Design Blog Design Blog » Historic Design

Feeding Desire Goes to Delaware

  • By: Ellen Lupton
  • | Wednesday November 12, 2008
  • | 2 Comment(s)

Feeding Desire: Design and the Tools of the Table
Just in time for the marathon eating season to begin, Cooper-Hewitt’s exhibition Feeding Desire: Design and the Tools of the Table is open at the Winterthur, a fantastic museum of decorative arts located in Delaware’s Brandywine Valley. The Winterthur is a curator’s dream destination, with its astonishing collection of historic objects and its richly stocked research library. The Winterthur is also a great place to visit with family and friends, and many great events are planned during Feeding Desire, including a Study Day with Cooper-Hewitt’s very own Sarah Coffin, the lead curator of Feeding Desire. If you’d rather sip, slurp, or simmer than study, check out other special events including a coffee tasting on December 4 or or a lesson on how to cook snapper soup on December 9 (bring a spoon). Feeding Desire is on view at the Winterthur through February 1, 2009.

Sustainable Sampling


At the end of the introduction to the Multiple Choice exhibition, the curator reflects that, “as contemporary design industries move to open-sourcing and electronic formats for the marketing of their products, physical samples may soon become obsolete.” From a future academic and archival view point, this is a sad possibility, as material sampling formats contain vast amounts of technical, cultural and artistic information. Samples are already rare enough in museum collections, as they were often thrown out by their original owners like other ephemera.

Yet, there is a positive aspect to this slow conversion from physical to alternative sampling formats – and that is the elimination of waste which comes from producing material samples. Besides being economical, the concept of foregoing actual samples of products in many stages of the design process is becoming an integral aspect of sustainable design theory. The recent event held here at the Museum titled Multiple Choice: Marketing Design in the Twenty-first Century explored, in part, more ecological marketing approaches than using physical samples. One of the companies that took part in the conversation was Tricycle, Inc, which is a design company with a uniquely sustainable outlook. Tricycle, Inc. assists other interior design firms in prototyping innovative sampling methods that not only cut costs, but are earth-friendly as well. I had the opportunity to ask Michael Hendrix, Chief Brand Officer, a few questions about their experience with alternative sampling formats in the industry.

Was Tricycle Inc. created with a sustainable mission, or did these practices (such as your paper samples of carpets) fall into place as time went on? What provoked them?

I love your question because I believe it’s good to keep yourself grounded and remember your history. In fact, I went back through some old e-mails to confirm how we first talked about the company. Our mission from the beginning has been to reduce sampling waste and cost in the carpet industry through technology and design. This was really provoked by personal experiences with the industry: I came to it through marketing, Jonathan through engineering & sales, Jamie and Andy through CAD. Geography plays a big part as well since Chattanooga is a half hour from Dalton, Georgia, the “Carpet Capital of the World.” Personally I was also looking for a career with greater meaning and the opportunity to change an industry for the better provided that for me.

Do you find paper and virtual samples to be not only more environment-friendly, but also cheaper? Are there any other positive benefits that virtual samples offer which physical samples cannot?

Paper samples are a better solution “on paper.” Compared to carpet they require 95% less energy, 95% less water, are easily recyclable and save up to 70% in costs. However these facts are not motivating on their own. For alternative sampling to become standard we have to design experiences that enhance the process. It’s human nature to resist change so we must provide an “upside” to encourage new behavior. At Tricycle we have ongoing discussions about transforming samples from abbreviated products to effective design tools. Can an alternative sample feature a product in different lighting environments? Can it be used to visualize installation options? Can it become a presentation tool rather than an order form? With digital technology the answer is “yes.” We do it now. We design more effective sampling and merchandising tools that conform to the way people want to create and work.

Do you think that the design industry in general is heading towards virtual and paper samples, instead of samples of the actual end product? What criticisms have you heard about alternative sampling formats?

We’re on the road to mass adoption but I believe it’s still a few years from critical mass. We’ll still have need for actual product samples since we’re only simulating a portion. In the early rounds of product selection enough information can be presented to make a decision concerning likes or dislikes toward a product — especially when a designer is somewhat familiar with the medium. We describe it as a creative funnel in which many ideas are considered at the top but they’re eventually vetted to a final solution. We operate at the top of the sieve, providing a tool for the early rounds of creativity. Our primary criticisms have been due to others misunderstanding this. We’re not out to replace all samples.

We also get criticisms about color shift in different lighting, a phenomenon called metamerism. It’s a challenge for anyone trying to match various materials in multiple environments. Most people experience it firsthand when they’re buying paint; what looks good in the store is always different at home. It’s a challenge of chemistry and light and we’re working on some innovative means to handle this.

Do you think that physical samples will ever disappear from the interior design industry?

For the reasons above I don’t think we’ll see the demise of every physical sample, but I do think we’ll see a reduction. Many aspects of our lives have been dematerialized, from currency, to communication to entertainment. There’s no reason to think that product selection will be exempt from this trend.

Photo Credit: Tricycle Inc.

Behind the Scenes of Multiple Choice: from Sample to Product

Exhibitions are hard work. At Cooper-Hewitt they are planned years in advance and involve several departments cooperating towards a common goal of creating the best exhibition possible. Once the research is completed, the objects chosen, the didactic panels and brochure text written, and the exhibition design layout completed, there is still one very important step that needs to occur: installation. The installation of an exhibition is an incredibly exciting time, when one gets a first glimpse of the realization of the curator’s vision. Players in the exhibition installation include the curators, conservators, registrars, and most importantly, the exhibition crew. The exhibition production team is a group of talented, hardworking individuals (often artists themselves) who strive to achieve the perfect balance of doing their job well in the short amount of time allotted. Constructing platforms and case decks, painting walls, creating mounts, applying graphics, cleaning cases – every task is critical to the successful installation of an exhibition.

Over the past few weeks I photographed several steps of the installation with the goal of giving you a glimpse of the enormous dedication and hard work involved in mounting this exhibition. We hope that you enjoy this small taste of the behind-the-scene action that occurred in installing Multiple Choice: from to Sample to Product.


Lucy Commoner, Head of Conservation and Curator of the Multiple Choice exhibition, carefully reattaches a celluloid button by Marion Weeber to its sample card. Sometimes an object must undergo conservation treatment in order to stabilize it for exhibition display.


Art handler Michael paints the case bases in the ground floor gallery that, only a few weeks later, will be occupied by the finished Multiple Choice exhibition.


Mathew “Jack-of-all-trades” Weaver (pictured here with another art handler, Jeff) is an integral member of the exhibitions team at Cooper-Hewitt. His work includes matting, framing, creating book and object mounts and general installation problem solving.


Several sample books await installation on their custom-made archival mounts. Objects are placed in protective storage until the moment they are ready to be installed.


Lucy Commoner and Mathew Weaver discuss placement of objects within a case. Although the location of objects is planned beforehand, sometimes there are small changes that need to be made to increase the understanding of one object with another and to assure visual continuity.


Even though the exhibition will not open for another week, art handlers Nanette and Harumi carefully place a Plexiglas vitrine over a case that has just been finished. Once a case has been filled with objects, it is immediately covered so that everything is protected from dirt and possible damage.

Sheer Invention


Piranesi’s originality lay in his eclecticism. Pulling together influences from Egyptian, Etruscan, Ancient Roman, and Greek designs, Piranesi presented a hybrid design system that was rooted in his commitment to the stature and importance of the Roman design heritage. From this starting point, the architectural elements move from historical recreations to articulated fantasy. While his contemporaries championed the supremacy of the Greek taste, Piranesi held on to his belief that the Romans were every bit as relevant to the course of architecture and design.

Much like post-modern architects, Piranesi believed that new design can result from re-combining existing motifs, ideas, and designs. One look at the magnificent spread of his imaginary architectural composition in the Parere su l’Architettura of 1765 instantly reveals his design aesthetic. Not only is the façade enormous, but it demonstrates an assemblage of elements from all the ancient sites and cultures from the Mediterranean. Greco-Roman elements are balanced on Egyptian lintels and pillars and columns support strange hybrids.

At the time, Piranesi was keenly aware of how his originality was ruffling the feathers of his Italian contemporaries, many of whom considered him a difficult personality and gave him a wide berth. Undaunted, Piranesi’s rebuttal to their disapproval of his design aesthetic was, “They despise my novelty, I their timidity.”